John L. Barry’s Power and Peril Calls for Curiosity in a Changing World

By Janice O’Brien

Maj. Gen. John L. Barry, USAF (Ret.), has spent much of his career working in environments where decisions carry consequences and easy answers are rarely available.

That experience shapes his approach to Power and Peril, a book that draws on history, leadership, national security, education, technology and institutional change to examine some of the challenges facing the United States in a rapidly evolving world.

Barry does not want readers to finish the book with a checklist of conclusions. He would rather they leave with better questions.

“If there is one purpose behind Power and Peril, it is not to tell readers what to think but to encourage them to be curious,” Barry said.

Barry served more than 30 years in the United States Air Force, rising to the rank of Major General. A fighter pilot, combat veteran and graduate of the USAF Fighter Weapons School, he held senior leadership positions during Desert Storm, the collapse of the Soviet Union and the military’s strategic transformation after the Cold War. As the Air Force’s lead strategic planner in the Pentagon, he survived the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks.

He later served as a board member and executive director of the Columbia Space Shuttle Accident Investigation following the 2003 loss of Columbia.

After retiring from the military, Barry brought his leadership experience into public education. He led Aurora Public Schools in Colorado, overseeing approximately 40,000 students and 60 schools. His work included an early concurrent enrollment initiative connecting high school students with opportunities to earn college credit and pursue workforce pathways.

Barry went on to serve as president and CEO of the Boys & Girls Clubs of Metro Denver and later as president and CEO of Wings Over the Rockies Air & Space Museum. His subsequent leadership roles have included the Air Force Historical Foundation and the National Aviation Hall of Fame.

Those experiences give Power and Peril a perspective that extends well beyond Barry’s military career. Throughout the book, he returns to questions that have followed him through several different chapters of his professional life: How do leaders respond to uncertainty? How do institutions adapt to rapid change? What can history teach us about challenges that initially appear unprecedented?

“Rather than predicting the future, I use history to provide perspective,” Barry said.

The book is organized in five broad movements. It begins by looking at leadership, government and constitutional structure before expanding to America’s place in a changing world. Later sections examine historical pressures on institutions, some of the major economic and technological challenges facing the country, and the importance of education, innovation, manufacturing, cybersecurity and civic engagement.

Barry describes the structure as similar to a strategic campaign plan, but the book is ultimately framed as an invitation to inquiry rather than a prediction of what comes next.

That distinction is important to him.

The issues explored in Power and Peril cross disciplines and rarely fit neatly into a single category. Technology can become an economic issue, a security issue and an education issue at the same time. Decisions about manufacturing can affect communities, national competitiveness and supply chains. Artificial intelligence raises questions not only about innovation but also about how organizations and individuals adapt when technology moves faster than established practices.

For Barry, history provides a way to put those changes into context.

“The issues explored in these pages, power, leadership, institutions, technology, security, and democracy, are too important to be viewed through the lens of slogans or partisan loyalty alone,” Barry said. “They deserve thoughtful inquiry and informed debate.”

That emphasis on inquiry also reflects Barry’s years in education. His intended audience extends beyond military or policy circles to educators, business leaders, students and readers interested in understanding how historical patterns can illuminate present-day challenges.

No background in constitutional law, military strategy or academic history is required. Barry’s goal is to make complex subjects accessible while encouraging readers to investigate them further.

A 1973 honor graduate of the United States Air Force Academy, Barry holds a master’s degree in public administration from the University of Oklahoma. He served as a White House Fellow at NASA during the Challenger era and later studied national security leadership at Harvard Kennedy School. His honors include Colorado Superintendent of the Year, the White House Presidential Lifetime Achievement Award and the FAA Master Pilot Award.

Across those different experiences, Barry has repeatedly worked within organizations undergoing change, from the military and aerospace world to public schools and nonprofit institutions.

That may explain why Power and Peril is ultimately less interested in forecasting what will happen next than in asking how people and institutions prepare for what they cannot predict.

Barry’s outlook remains grounded in the idea that institutions can learn, adapt and endure.

“I believe America has repeatedly overcome extraordinary challenges because its institutions have proven remarkably resilient,” Barry said. “The question is whether we have the discipline, humility, and historical perspective to strengthen them for the next 250 years.”

His final challenge to readers is similarly straightforward: resist the temptation to expect history to provide perfect answers.

Instead, use it to ask better questions.

“If readers finish this book with more questions than answers, then I will have succeeded,” Barry said. “Curiosity is the beginning of wisdom.”

Power and Peril is available on Amazon.

The Real AI Divide Is Not Access, It Is Implementation

By Natalie Johnson

Over the past year, while studying at Stanford Graduate School of Business, I spoke with more than 150 operators, founders, executives and investors across 16 industries, and wrote a working paper on how small and mid-sized companies are adopting artificial intelligence. The industries varied, but the same pattern appeared repeatedly: capable employees were spending large parts of their day transferring information, reconciling records and compensating for software that did not work together.

In field services, technicians may record the parts used on a job on paper slips that the office later uses to prepare the invoice. If a slip goes missing, the company can end up paying for parts it installed but never charged the customer for.

These gaps consume employee time and can leave revenue uncollected. They also give
businesses a concrete place to begin improving how work gets done.

Access to AI tools is only the starting point

Almost every company can buy the same chatbots, meeting recorders and writing assistants at roughly the same price. They are useful, but they leave the company’s underlying operations largely unchanged. The insurance broker can now draft a client email faster and still has to re-enter the entire client record after every sale.

The larger opportunity lies in redesigning the workflow. Information can be captured once, checked against existing records and written into every system that needs it. Employees can intervene when something is incomplete or unusual rather than processing every case manually.

Some of this requires AI, especially when information arrives through emails, scanned documents or inconsistent forms. Some of it is conventional engineering, such as connecting systems, managing records and enforcing business rules. Meaningful implementations usually require both.

The economic value is not limited to cutting costs. In many service businesses, employee time constrains revenue. A brokerage that reduces administrative work can handle more clients and spend more time finding new business.

The same workforce can support a larger business because more of its time goes toward work customers value.

Implementation takes more than a software license

Building these systems requires someone to understand how the work is actually performed, including the exceptions experienced employees have learned to handle over years. Existing systems must be connected, duplicate records reconciled and unwritten business rules made explicit. The new workflow then has to be tested against the awkward cases that rarely appear in a demonstration but appear constantly in daily operations.

Large enterprises generally have more resources to take this on: internal technology teams, specialists and budgets for experimentation. They are better placed to absorb a failed pilot, learn from it and try again.

Smaller companies face a different calculation. The owner of a regional brokerage, accounting practice or field-services company may know exactly which workflow should be fixed first. What the business often lacks is the technical team to build the system, the management capacity to
oversee it and the financial room to absorb an unsuccessful first attempt.

Among the operating companies in my interview sample, 89 percent had gone no further than
adding chatbots to existing work. Only 8 percent had rebuilt even one workflow from beginning
to end, while 3 percent had created the connected operating foundation required to go further.

That is the real AI divide now emerging. Access to the tools is becoming widely distributed. The
capacity to implement them is not.

Making implementation affordable

Investors pursuing AI-enabled roll-ups illustrate one way the economics of implementation could work. By acquiring several similar businesses, they can fund a central technology team that spreads the cost across the group, reuses integrations and improves the system over time.

Independent operators need a way to access comparable support without having to become
part of a larger group.

Some software companies already combine their products with hands-on implementation, particularly in the enterprise market. Small and mid-sized businesses need access to the same kind of support at a price they can afford, with a provider responsible for understanding the workflow, connecting the systems and making sure the solution works in day-to-day operations.

For these businesses, implementation needs to be part of what they buy, rather than another project their team has to figure out.

Where smaller businesses can start

Not every small business should attempt an ambitious transformation. Some first need better systems, cleaner data or more consistent processes. Many, however, already have an obvious place to begin: the workflow employees complain about most, where the same information is copied, checked and entered all day again. To decide whether it is worth tackling first, look at how often it happens, how much employee time it consumes and its effect on customer service, costs or revenue.

The goal is not to install more AI, but to return people’s time to work that produces revenue, strengthens customer relationships or requires genuine judgment.

Unless implementation becomes easier to buy, the companies with the most to gain from AI may remain the least able to put it to work.

Website: https://www.red6.ai/

LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/rohit-arumugam/