July 16, 2026 - San Francisco Post

Pier 70 Redevelopment Plan Adds Proposal for 600 More Homes

San Francisco Staff 2 on July 16, 2026

Brookfield Properties has proposed revising its Pier 70 redevelopment plan in San Francisco’s Dogpatch neighborhood by adding approximately 600 additional homes. The changes aim to increase residential capacity while preserving the project’s mixed-use vision, pending approval from city officials and the Port Commission.

Key Takeaways

Brookfield Properties has proposed increasing the project’s maximum housing capacity from 2,150 to 2,750 units.
The revised plan would allow additional residential density through modest increases in building height.
The proposal requires approval from the San Francisco Port Commission and the San Francisco Board of Supervisors.
The developer stated the revisions are intended to improve the project’s financial feasibility.
Community organizations are reviewing the proposal while examining its effect on affordable housing within the revised plan.

Brookfield Properties has proposed revisions to the Pier 70 redevelopment that would increase the number of planned homes at the San Francisco waterfront project by approximately 600 units. The proposal was presented during a San Francisco Port Commission executive session and seeks approval to modify the existing development agreement, making it one of the city’s most significant pending residential development updates.

If approved, the revised plan would raise the project’s maximum residential capacity from 2,150 homes to 2,750 homes. Brookfield Properties stated the additional housing is intended to improve the financial viability of future construction while maintaining the broader mixed-use vision for the 28-acre waterfront site in Dogpatch.

The proposal must move through the city’s review process before any changes can take effect. Both the San Francisco Port Commission and the San Francisco Board of Supervisors are expected to consider amendments to the development agreement.

Pier 70 Redevelopment Proposal Expands Planned Housing

The revised proposal would increase residential capacity by about 28% compared with the project’s current approval.

Brookfield Properties plans to accommodate the additional homes by making targeted adjustments to residential buildings rather than expanding the project’s overall footprint. The changes focus primarily on increasing density within portions of the approved master plan.

The proposal follows continued attention on residential construction across the city, including the Balboa Park housing project, which also reflects efforts to expand housing opportunities through large-scale development.

According to the proposal, the additional housing would support the next phase of development at Pier 70 while preserving the project’s combination of residential, commercial and public spaces.

The Pier 70 redevelopment remains one of San Francisco’s largest long-term waterfront redevelopment projects. Plans for the site include housing, commercial space, public open areas and restored historic buildings.

City approval is required before construction can proceed under the revised framework.

Revised Development Plan Increases Residential Density

Building Height Changes Included in the Proposal

Brookfield Properties has proposed modest increases in building height to accommodate additional residential units.

Several residential buildings would increase from approximately 70 feet to 90 feet. The proposed height remains within the maximum limits previously established for the development area.

The developer stated that allowing additional homes within individual buildings would improve the financial feasibility of future construction phases while making more efficient use of approved development parcels.

The revised proposal does not introduce a new master plan. Instead, it modifies portions of the existing development agreement governing residential density.

First Residential Phase Targets 2027 Construction

Brookfield Properties stated that the revisions could support construction of the next residential phase beginning in 2027, subject to receiving the required approvals.

One planned apartment building within the project’s first housing phase would benefit from the revised density, allowing additional apartments within the same development area.

The first phase of residential construction would include hundreds of homes across multiple buildings, including affordable housing and market-rate residences already incorporated into the approved project. Similar efforts to increase housing availability have also been seen through expanded affordable housing access in other communities.

The proposed revisions are intended to support continued construction after several large housing developments across San Francisco encountered financial challenges affecting new residential projects.

Affordable Housing Remains Part of the Project Plan

Affordable housing continues to be included within the Pier 70 redevelopment under the proposed revisions.

Brookfield Properties has indicated that the total number of affordable homes included in the project would remain unchanged under the revised proposal. However, because the overall number of homes would increase, affordable housing would represent a smaller percentage of the completed development.

Community Groups Review Proposed Revisions

Neighborhood organizations have begun reviewing the proposal as it advances through the city’s approval process.

Community representatives have expressed interest in understanding how the revised plan would affect the delivery of affordable housing throughout future construction phases.

The proposal has also prompted discussion about maintaining commitments established in the original development agreement while allowing modifications intended to support construction.

Housing availability and affordability remain important considerations as city officials evaluate the proposed amendments. The proposal also adds to ongoing discussions surrounding life sciences real estate in San Francisco and the balance between commercial growth and residential development.

Any revisions approved by the city would become part of the updated development framework governing future phases at Pier 70.

Building 12 Continues to Attract Businesses and Visitors

Commercial Tenants Support Ongoing Redevelopment

While residential construction remains subject to future approvals, Building 12 continues operating as an active commercial destination within the Pier 70 site.

The restored historic building is home to a range of local businesses, including food, beverage, retail and creative enterprises. Those businesses continue serving visitors while additional redevelopment plans move forward.

The Pier 70 campus also includes recreational amenities that have expanded activity within the neighborhood. New outdoor pickleball and padel courts are under development alongside existing indoor facilities.

Additional commercial tenants are expected to occupy office space within Building 12 as previously announced development plans continue.

Brookfield Properties has also identified future office development as part of the site’s long-term vision, subject to market conditions and construction timing.

Approval Process Moves Through City Review

The proposed revisions require formal approval before additional housing can be incorporated into the project.

The San Francisco Port Commission will review amendments related to the waterfront property before the proposal advances to the San Francisco Board of Supervisors for consideration.

Any approved changes would revise the existing development agreement governing residential density and certain building specifications.

City officials will review planning considerations, housing commitments and project requirements before determining whether to authorize the proposed amendments.

If approved, the revised plan would allow Brookfield Properties to move forward with expanded residential construction under the updated development framework.

The proposal represents the latest stage in the ongoing planning process for the Pier 70 redevelopment, which combines housing, commercial uses, public open space and preservation of historic industrial structures within the Dogpatch waterfront district.

Frequently Asked Questions

What changes are proposed for the Pier 70 redevelopment?

Brookfield Properties has proposed revising the approved development plan by increasing the maximum number of homes from 2,150 to 2,750 while making limited building height adjustments within the existing project.

How many homes would be added under the revised Pier 70 plan?

The proposal would add approximately 600 residential units, increasing the project’s overall housing capacity by about 28%.

Which agencies must approve the updated Pier 70 proposal?

The revised development agreement requires approval from the San Francisco Port Commission and the San Francisco Board of Supervisors before the changes can take effect.

How does the revised plan affect affordable housing at Pier 70?

The proposal would maintain the total number of affordable homes currently planned, although affordable housing would represent a smaller percentage of the project’s larger residential total.

What businesses currently operate at Pier 70’s Building 12?

Building 12 is occupied by a variety of local businesses, including restaurants, a brewery, creative studios, retail tenants, recreational facilities and office users, making it an active part of the Pier 70 waterfront redevelopment.

John Berra’s Quiet Argument: The Right Innovations Often Come From the Actually Frustrating Jobs

San Francisco Post Staff on July 16, 2026

There’s a romantic version of how innovation happens. A spark of inspiration, a garage, a breakthrough. John Berra’s career suggests a less cinematic but more reliable version. Sometimes innovation starts with a boring job and a question you can’t stop asking yourself.

John eventually became Chairman of Emerson Process Management, was named one of the fifty most influential industry innovators by Intech Magazine, and was voted into the Process Automation Hall of Fame. His book Turning the Giant traces how he got there, and the starting point is more relatable than you’d expect.

The Question That Wouldn’t Go Away

Early in his career at Monsanto, John worked as an engineer doing repetitive technical tasks. Day after day, the same kind of work. And day after day, the same thought kept surfacing: there has to be a better way.

Most people have that thought occasionally and let it pass. John didn’t. He describes it as frustration, properly channeled, and looking at his career, it’s clear that the channeling is the part that mattered. The frustration alone wouldn’t have gone anywhere. What he did with it did.

Giants Are a Permanent Fixture, Not a Phase

The central metaphor of John’s book is the “giant,” the recurring obstacles, bureaucracy, skepticism, competition, self-doubt, that don’t go away once you reach a certain level of success. If anything, they get bigger.

John learned this directly as he moved from engineering roles into leadership at Fisher-Rosemount Systems and eventually Emerson. The bureaucracy he encountered as a senior leader was a different scale entirely from anything he’d dealt with earlier. What didn’t change was the underlying lesson: these forces can’t be eliminated. They have to be worked with.

Trust Is Built One Conversation at a Time

One of the more grounded ideas in John’s reflections is about how change actually moves through an organization. It’s tempting to think of transformation as something that happens through big announcements or top-down mandates. John’s experience suggests otherwise.

Real change happens through individual conversations with individual skeptics, repeated patiently, often over long periods of time. Turning a giant, in practice, often looks like turning one person’s mind at a time, and doing it consistently enough that it eventually adds up to something larger.

Doubt Isn’t Disqualifying

John is also candid about the emotional reality of pursuing ambitious goals. Self-doubt followed him at nearly every major step forward in his career, particularly when the responsibilities were unfamiliar.

He frames this not as something to overcome once and move past, but as something that simply accompanies growth. If you’re not feeling some version of uncertainty, you might not be stretching as much as you think you are.

Where Innovation Actually Lives

John also pushes back on the idea that big organizations are innovation deserts. Several of the most significant transformations in his career happened inside large, established companies, not despite their size, but with leaders willing to challenge how things had always been done from within that structure.

The Habit Worth Building

If there’s one habit John hopes readers take from his book, it’s a simple reframe. When resistance shows up, don’t ask how to defeat it or whether to avoid it. Ask how it can be turned.

It’s a small shift in language. But it’s the shift that, according to John, makes all the difference.

If the best leaders you know seem to move through resistance rather than against it, John Berra explains exactly how in Turning the Giant, available now on Amazon.

Royston G King Reviews What a Name Comes to Mean in a Searchable World

San Francisco Post Staff on July 16, 2026

In a world where nearly everyone can be looked up, a name becomes a kind of summary, and his pieces often engage with what that summary is made of. The entrepreneur treats the searchable meaning of a name as something built deliberately over time, through the accumulated record that surfaces when someone searches, rather than as something simply given. In the discussion that follows, Royston G King reviews what a name comes to mean in a searchable world and sets out what he has come to believe about it.

The premise is that an online name is no longer just a label. It is an entry point to a record, and what that record contains shapes how the name is understood before any direct interaction takes place. When someone encounters the name, they encounter, in effect, whatever the searchable record has accumulated, which makes the tending of that record consequential.

This is a theme many of his pieces explore. The meaning that attaches to a name, in King’s framing, is the sum of the consistent, verifiable signals associated with it over time. A name backed by a long record of substantiated work means something different from a name backed by inflated claims that do not survive scrutiny, even if both once sounded impressive. Much of the interest lies in how Royston G King reviews what a name comes to mean in a searchable world rather than in the verdict itself.

His own name is handled in keeping with this understanding. His public profile notes recognition on the Forbes 30 Under 30 list and, according to his profile, he studied at the University of Southern California and Columbia University. He tends to treat these as verifiable elements of a searchable record rather than as claims meant to be accepted uncritically, which fits someone who understands that a name’s meaning is built from what can be checked.

Artificial intelligence complicates the picture, and his pieces often note the complication. As synthetic content proliferates, the record around any name grows noisier, and fabricated or misleading material can surface alongside accurate information. This makes the deliberate cultivation of consistent, verifiable signals more important because it gives audiences something trustworthy to anchor to amid the noise.

There is a discipline implied in building what a name means. Because the searchable record is durable and cumulative, the emphasis falls on consistency and on claims that withstand scrutiny, since these are what hold up as the record grows. Short-term tactics that inflate a name tend to backfire, because the record remembers, and inconsistencies eventually surface to anyone who looks.

Readers of his pieces will notice that this framing treats a name as an asset to be built rather than a fixed possession. The meaning attached to a name is not static. It accumulates from the record, which means it can be strengthened through consistent, verifiable work or weakened through inflation and inconsistency. Tending it is an ongoing task.

The cumulative nature of a searchable record is what gives this its weight. No single entry defines a name, but the accumulation of entries, consistent or contradictory, substantiated or hollow, gradually settles into an impression. His pieces often stress this cumulative quality, since it means that a name’s meaning is authored over time by everything associated with it rather than by any one moment. A person has real influence over this authorship, through the consistency and verifiability of what they contribute, but they do not have complete control, because others contribute too. Tending the record is therefore an ongoing negotiation between what one puts into the world and what the world puts back, conducted in public and preserved indefinitely.

That is ultimately how Royston G King reviews what a name comes to mean in a searchable world, and it is a reading built on evidence rather than noise. For anyone with a searchable presence, which is now nearly everyone, the implication is direct. A name means whatever its searchable record makes it mean, and that record is built deliberately over time. Investing in consistency and verifiability builds a name that holds up under scrutiny, while relying on inflation builds one that does not. That understanding of what a name comes to mean in a searchable world is among the more resonant ideas that his pieces consistently offer.

To learn more about Royston G King and follow his latest work, visit his official website, connect with him on LinkedIn, follow him on Instagram, or watch his content on YouTube.

Day: July 16, 2026

Pier 70 Redevelopment Plan Adds Proposal for 600 More Homes

Key Takeaways

Pier 70 Redevelopment Proposal Expands Planned Housing

Revised Development Plan Increases Residential Density

Building Height Changes Included in the Proposal

First Residential Phase Targets 2027 Construction

Affordable Housing Remains Part of the Project Plan

Community Groups Review Proposed Revisions

Building 12 Continues to Attract Businesses and Visitors

Commercial Tenants Support Ongoing Redevelopment

Approval Process Moves Through City Review

Frequently Asked Questions

What changes are proposed for the Pier 70 redevelopment?

How many homes would be added under the revised Pier 70 plan?

Which agencies must approve the updated Pier 70 proposal?

How does the revised plan affect affordable housing at Pier 70?

What businesses currently operate at Pier 70’s Building 12?

John Berra’s Quiet Argument: The Right Innovations Often Come From the Actually Frustrating Jobs

The Question That Wouldn’t Go Away

Giants Are a Permanent Fixture, Not a Phase

Trust Is Built One Conversation at a Time

Doubt Isn’t Disqualifying

Where Innovation Actually Lives

The Habit Worth Building

Royston G King Reviews What a Name Comes to Mean in a Searchable World

News Variety

Legal

News Variety

Legal