Golden Gate Park’s Iconic Cypress Tree Removed After 100 Years

Golden Gate Park just lost one of its oldest living landmarks, a towering Monterey cypress that stood for over a century. Its removal marks the end of an era, but its legacy will live on in the park’s nature exploration areas. For generations of San Franciscans, the tree wasn’t just part of the landscape, it was part of the city’s story.

The 90-foot cypress, located on the eastern edge of Hellman Hollow, was removed in October 2025 after its trunk split, creating a significant safety hazard. Arborists from the San Francisco Recreation and Park Department determined that the tree could no longer be stabilized. The decision, while difficult, was made with public safety and ecological stewardship in mind.

A Living Landmark in the Heart of the Park

The Monterey cypress was more than a tree, it was a fixture of Golden Gate Park’s identity. Planted in the early 20th century, it grew alongside the city’s evolution, offering shade to picnickers, concertgoers, and weekend wanderers. Its sweeping canopy became a natural refuge, a backdrop for countless photos, and a meeting point for locals and tourists alike.

Its presence was especially felt during annual events like the Golden Gate Park concerts, where its branches framed stages and softened the edges of large crowds. For many, the tree was a quiet witness to San Francisco’s cultural heartbeat, from the Summer of Love to the rise of outdoor wellness culture.

Botanists often pointed to the tree as a prime example of Monterey cypress resilience. Native to California’s central coast, the species thrives in foggy, wind-swept environments, making Golden Gate Park an ideal home. But even the hardiest trees face limits, and after decades of weathering storms, droughts, and foot traffic, this cypress reached its final season.

From Tragedy to Transformation

The tree’s removal wasn’t taken lightly. After a recent inspection revealed a dangerous split in its trunk, arborists determined that the risk to public safety was too great. Rather than letting the tree’s story end in silence, the city chose to honor it in a uniquely San Francisco way.

In a sustainable twist, the cypress will be repurposed for the park’s nature exploration areas. Its wood will be transformed into benches, play structures, and educational installations, ensuring that future generations can continue to engage with its legacy. This approach reflects the city’s commitment to circular design and ecological storytelling.

“Though it can no longer stand, its story isn’t over,” the Recreation and Park Department shared in a public statement. “Its wood will continue to bring joy.”

The transformation also aligns with the park’s broader mission to create immersive, hands-on experiences for children and families. By integrating the tree into nature play zones, the city is turning loss into learning, offering a tactile connection to history, ecology, and resilience.

A Park That Evolves With Its People

Golden Gate Park has always been a living, breathing part of San Francisco’s identity. From its Victorian-era origins to its modern-day role as a cultural and ecological hub, the park reflects the city’s values: resilience, reinvention, and reverence for nature.

The cypress’s removal is a reminder that even the most iconic elements of the park are subject to change. But it’s also a testament to how the city honors its past while planning for the future. By integrating the tree into new educational spaces, the park continues to evolve without forgetting its roots.

Golden Gate Park’s Iconic Cypress Tree Removed After 100 Years

Photo Credit: Unsplash.com

This ethos is echoed in the park’s many stories, like the enduring mystery of The Fog Eater of Golden Gate Park, a local legend that captures the imagination of visitors and locals alike. Whether myth or memory, these stories shape the park’s character and deepen its connection to the community.

Community Reflections and Farewell

The response to the tree’s removal has been heartfelt. Social media lit up with photos, memories, and tributes from San Franciscans who grew up under its branches. Some recalled childhood games played in its shade; others shared snapshots from weddings, protests, and concerts where the cypress loomed large in the background.

City gardener, who has worked in the park for over two decades, described the tree as “a quiet guardian.” “It was always there,” she said. “Losing it feels like saying goodbye to an old friend.”

Local historians also weighed in, noting that the tree’s lifespan mirrored key moments in San Francisco’s development, from the post-earthquake rebuilding era to the rise of environmental activism in the 1970s. Its presence was a constant in a city known for change.

What’s Next for Hellman Hollow

With the cypress gone, the city is already planning how to reimagine the space. Landscape architects are working with community groups to design a new gathering area that honors the tree’s history while enhancing the Hollow’s natural beauty. The repurposed wood will be used to create interactive features that invite reflection, play, and learning.

This approach reflects a broader trend in urban park management, one that values sustainability, storytelling, and community engagement. Golden Gate Park isn’t just preserving its past; it’s using it to inspire what comes next.

The redesign will also include native plantings and interpretive signage that educate visitors about Monterey cypress ecology, climate resilience, and the role of trees in urban wellness. It’s a chance to turn a farewell into a forward-looking experience.

A Legacy That Lives On

The removal of the 100-year-old cypress is a poignant moment for San Francisco. But it’s also a celebration of continuity. The tree may be gone, but its spirit remains, woven into the fabric of the park, the memories of its visitors, and the wood that will soon support new generations of explorers.

In a city that’s constantly reinventing itself, Golden Gate Park remains a grounding force. And even as its landscape changes, its heart, rooted in community, culture, and care, continues to grow.

Two Former IRS Insiders Break Down the Truth About the Marketing Around Tax Settlements

By: Elowen Gray

For taxpayers across the Bay Area and the nation facing significant IRS debt, the widespread advertising claiming financial relief can be an appealing offer. Slogans suggesting that tax liabilities can be settled for “pennies on the dollar” present an appealing but misleading idea of relief. However, a detailed analysis from two former high-level IRS officials reveals a stark disconnect between these marketing claims and the reality of the tax resolution process.

Michael D. Sullivan, the former IRS Revenue Officer, and Peter Salinger, the former OIC Supervisor, have developed an extensive breakdown of the popular misconceptions that are circulating in the tax relief industry. Their results indicate that these stories are a major reason for the historically low acceptance rate of the IRS Offer in Compromise (OIC) program, which is only 21% at the moment. The authors point out that equipping consumers with a clearer grasp of the realities can make them immune to losing thousands in fees for non-viable results.

The Reality Behind the Numbers

The 21% approval rate for the OIC program is not just a statistic; it represents a significant challenge for taxpayers seeking relief. Last year, while over 33,000 applications were submitted, only 7,199 were accepted, leaving more than 26,000 taxpayers with rejected claims. According to the analysis by Sullivan and Salinger, this is not an indication of the program’s failure, but rather a symptom of it being overwhelmed by applications from individuals who were never eligible.

“The core issue is that eligibility for a settlement is based on a strict financial formula, not on a firm’s negotiating prowess,” stated Sullivan. “Consumers are being sold a service based on a marketing promise, but the IRS makes its decision based on financial facts. When those two things don’t align, the taxpayer is the one who loses.”

The Claims of “Pennies on the Dollar” Settlement

The powerful and pervasive myth is that settling tax debt for a small fraction of the original amount is a common result. The experts clarify that while such settlements are possible, they are the exception, not the rule. The outcome of an OIC is determined by a rigid government formula known as “Reasonable Collection Potential” (RCP). This formula calculates a taxpayer’s precise ability to pay by analyzing their assets (equity in homes, cars, and bank accounts) and their future income, minus a set of standardized, allowable living expenses. Suppose the RCP calculation indicates that a taxpayer can afford to pay their debt in full over the life of the collection statute. In that case, their offer will be rejected, regardless of any claims made by their representative.

Misleading Claims with “Fresh Start” Special Programs  

Many marketing campaigns heavily feature the “IRS Fresh Start Program,” often presenting it as a new, limited-time opportunity or a special plan that offers a settlement. This is fundamentally misleading, according to the former agents. 

The Fresh Start initiative is a real, long-standing IRS program. Still, it is simply a brand name for a collection of existing relief options, including installment agreements and the OIC itself. It does not provide any secret backdoor, special eligibility criteria, or a higher chance of success. Its use in advertising often creates a false sense of urgency and exclusivity.

Firms Enticing Consumers with “Insider Access” 

A common implication in advertising is that a particular firm has a special, influential relationship with the IRS that gives its clients an advantage. Sullivan and Salinger debunk this entirely. The IRS operates on a system of laws, regulations, and standardized procedures that apply to every case. 

There are no secret handshakes or backroom deals that can influence an outcome. Every tax professional must follow the same publicly available rules. The IRS also offers an online pre-qualifier tool, free for everyone, that allows taxpayers to check their eligibility for an Offer in Compromise (OIC) in just a few minutes. Experts highly recommend this as a preliminary step before engaging any professional service that charges a fee. 

To be on the safe side, experts advise consumers to verify the validity of their claims and only work with licensed practitioners. They also recommend that thorough financial reviews be performed to ascertain eligibility before paying any fee.

Michael D. Sullivan and Peter Salinger are former IRS agents and the co-authors of Exposing the Secrets for IRS Settlements. With a combined 75 years of experience, they provide educational resources and professional guidance to help taxpayers handle unique IRS issues. Mr. Sullivan is a former IRS Revenue Officer and instructor, while Mr. Salinger is a former IRS Appeals Settlement Officer who personally managed over 3,500 Offer in Compromise cases.

 

Disclaimer: The information provided in this article is for educational purposes only and is not intended as legal or financial advice. The claims made about tax settlements and the IRS Offer in Compromise (OIC) program are based on general information and may not apply to every individual situation. Results may vary depending on eligibility, financial circumstances, and other factors. It is recommended that taxpayers consult a qualified tax professional or IRS representative to discuss their specific case and explore available options.